Skip to main content

Section 17.6 Irregular Resolutions of Secondary Chords

The roots of secondary dominants do not always resolve down a perfect fifth to the tonicized chord. In many of the examples of popular music with secondary dominants at the beginning of this chapter, the secondary dominants resolve deceptively.
Figure 17.6.1. Paul McCartney, “Yesterday” (1965)
In “Yesterday,” the V/V resolves not to V but to IV, which sometimes acts as a substitute for the V chord (the dominant) in popular music.
This progression also happens in “Forget You,” where a V7/V resolves to a IV chord.
Figure 17.6.2. Bruno Mars, CeeLo Green, Philip Lawrence, and Ari Levine, “Forget You” (2010)
In “I Want You to Want Me” by Cheap Trick, the V/V chord resolves to a subtonic ♭VII chord in A major.
Figure 17.6.3. Rick Nielson, “I Want You to Want Me” (1977)
Remember, however, that the subtonic ♭VII in major can act as a substitute for the dominant (see the Harmonic Flowchart for Popular Music with Subtonic VII chord in Major).
In “Baby Love” by the Supremes, a C7/B in C major (V24/IV) resolves to an A7 chord (V7/ii), which then resolves to ii (Dm). In this example, notice that the B♭ in the C7/B is a lowered chromatic note that wants to resolve downward by half step to A. Instead of this A being the third of the IV chord (an F major chord), which is the traditional and expected resolution, it is the root of an A7 chord (V7/ii).
Figure 17.6.4. Lamont Dozier, Brian Holland, and Eddie Holland, “Baby Love” (1964)
Finally, a rather common deceptive resolution of a secondary dominant is V7/vi to IV, which can be seen in the following three examples.
Figure 17.6.5. Steve Cropper and Otis Redding, “(Sittin’ On) The Dock of the Bay” (1967)
Figure 17.6.6. John Lennon, “Imagine” (1971)
Figure 17.6.7. Beethoven, Piano Sonata Op. 53, I (1804)
There are two ways to conceptualize this progression. The first is that the progression of iii to IV (Em to F in C major) is not unusual, so E to F, which appears to be III to IV but is in fact V/vi to IV, is a chromatic modification of iii to IV. The other way to think of V/vi to IV is as V/vi to VI/vi, a deceptive progression within the submediant area.
We can conclude that secondary chords do not always resolve strictly to the chords they appear to be tonicizing.